DailyBeat

India's Largest Digital News Media

Trump Claims U.S. Sent Iran Nuclear Deal Proposal, but Tehran Denies Receiving Any Written Offer

Spread the love

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has recently claimed that the United States has put forward a proposal to Iran concerning its nuclear program. However, Iranian officials are pushing back, saying they have not received any formal or written communication from the U.S., further highlighting the complicated state of diplomatic relations between the two nations.

Trump’s Remarks on Nuclear Diplomacy

Speaking at an event in Doha, Trump voiced hope for resolving the long-standing nuclear dispute with Iran. He suggested that the U.S. had already delivered a proposal aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear activities. Emphasizing the importance of diplomacy over conflict, Trump argued that both nations would benefit from a peaceful agreement.

Trump also mentioned that discussions were ongoing at a technical level, reportedly involving U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. According to him, these talks had taken place in neutral locations such as Oman and Rome, with uranium enrichment—one of the core disputes—being a key topic.

Iran Denies Any Official Proposal

Despite Trump’s statement, Iranian officials, including Abbas Araghchi, have denied receiving any written document or official proposal from the U.S. Araghchi dismissed the claim outright and accused Washington of sending mixed signals that make genuine diplomatic progress difficult.

He reiterated Iran’s long-standing position: meaningful negotiations are only possible if the U.S. abandons its policy of heavy economic sanctions and military threats. Araghchi stressed that without a clear and consistent approach from the American side, Tehran sees little incentive to trust in the negotiation process.

History of Distrust

This latest disagreement comes against a backdrop of long-standing mistrust between the two countries. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has consistently dismissed U.S. overtures, including those from Trump, calling them deceptive and insincere.

Khamenei referenced the U.S. decision to pull out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) as proof that Washington cannot be trusted. The JCPOA was originally intended to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities in exchange for sanctions relief, but Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018, leading to increased tensions.

According to Khamenei, Iran has no interest in developing nuclear weapons but will also not halt its nuclear research due to foreign pressure or threats.

Escalating Tensions

The broader geopolitical context continues to fuel instability. The United States has warned that it may resort to military options if Iran continues to expand its nuclear program, while Iran has threatened to ramp up its activities further if provoked.

This tit-for-tat rhetoric has heightened fears of a potential conflict in the region. Both nations have shown little willingness to back down, instead engaging in public statements that emphasize their respective red lines and strategic goals.

Looking Ahead

Despite these public disagreements, there is still some indication that both sides might be open to indirect talks. Iran has not ruled out engaging through intermediaries such as Oman, and the U.S. has signaled that it remains interested in pursuing diplomatic options—though only if Iran shows a serious intent to address international concerns about its nuclear program.

The international community continues to watch the situation closely, with hopes that renewed diplomatic efforts can prevent further escalation and maintain regional stability. However, substantial obstacles remain, particularly due to the deep-rooted mistrust and lack of clear communication.

In summary, while Trump insists that the U.S. has made a nuclear offer to Iran, Tehran’s denial and the ongoing hostilities between the two sides suggest that any path to a diplomatic resolution will be challenging and uncertain. The coming weeks may be pivotal in determining whether the two countries can bridge the divide and find common ground.